Pinned leki ⚔️ @mkfilko Jun 25 In 1-2 years: You will be kicking yourself because: $BRUN would have ran to $120 $MRLN...
A pinned short-form post that asserts 1–2 year upside targets for five tickers (US, Australia, UK, Korea). The author states these are high-conviction targets but provides no supporting catalysts, valuation analysis, or risk framing in the post itself.
Linked assets
Tickers mentioned: SILC, IQE, MRLN, EOS.AX, BRUN. The post provides target-price-style assertions without accompanying analysis or time-bound catalysts — conviction is based on the author's statement alone.
Ticker: SILC — included in a pinned post asserting a 1–2 year upside target. No supporting catalysts or analysis provided in the post.
Evidence is solely the author’s stated target and horizon; no catalysts or valuation work included in the text.
Ticker: IQE — included in a pinned post asserting a 1–2 year upside target. No supporting catalysts or analysis provided in the post.
Evidence is solely the author’s stated target and horizon; no catalysts or valuation work included in the text.
Ticker: MRLN — included in a pinned post asserting a 1–2 year upside target. No supporting catalysts or analysis provided in the post.
Evidence is solely the author’s stated target and horizon; no catalysts or valuation work included in the text.
Ticker: EOS.AX — included in a pinned post asserting a 1–2 year upside target. No supporting catalysts or analysis provided in the post.
Evidence is solely the author’s stated target and horizon; no catalysts or valuation work included in the text.
Ticker: BRUN — included in a pinned post asserting a 1–2 year upside target (example call: would have run to $120). No supporting catalysts or analysis provided in the post.
Evidence is solely the author’s stated target and horizon; no catalysts or valuation work included in the text.
Source proof
Source proof: Strong source proof | 5 extracted claims | 5 directional assets | 1 supporting author | headline-like title review
Primary source: a single pinned social post by leki ⚔️ (@mkfilko) dated Jun 25 that lists multiple tickers with 1–2 year upside claims. Supplementary posts by the same author cover general technical-analysis education and various single-ticker technical observations (mostly on $TSLA), but do not provide the missing fundamental or catalyst detail for the tickers in this pinned post.
Single short post asserting 1–2 year upside price targets for several tickers (multi-market: US, Australia, UK, Korea). No supporting catalysts included in the text beyond the author claiming they are not random targets and that prior posts exist (not provided here). Actionability is low-to-moderate: directional and horizon are clear, but no thesis details, timing catalysts, valuation, or risk framing are provided in the post itself.
Post is promotional/educational content: an “ultimate TA guide/TA bible” covering EMAs, multi-timeframe confluence, Fibonacci levels, volume analysis, candlesticks/patterns, and synthesis. No explicit tickers, macro views, catalysts, or trade calls in the provided text.
Single-ticker technical sentiment post on TSLA: slight red day but author remains bullish due to holding ~$420, described as key technical confluence (POC, AVWAP from ATH, 20SMA). No fundamental catalyst or timeframe beyond near-term implied.
Post is a single-ticker technical observation: author notes a potential cup-and-handle pattern in $TSLA. No catalyst, levels, timeframe, or position sizing provided; actionable only as a near-term technical setup watch.
Very short, vague technical-analysis prompt on $TSLA (“Pull up 1H… do you see what I’m seeing?”) with no explicit pattern, level, catalyst, or direction stated. Actionability is low; at most it implies a near-term technical setup worth monitoring.
Post argues $TSLA is bullish based on technical indicators: inverted hammer candle close, proprietary trend tool “BX‑Trender” green tape, Williams %R above -50, and 9EMA holding as support. No fundamentals, catalyst, sizing, or risk levels provided.
Single short post disclosing prior losses in $TSLA and emphasizing patience/learning; no explicit forward-looking thesis, catalyst, valuation, product-cycle, or position-change detail.
Single-ticker technical-analysis comment on $TSLA suggesting RSI ~50 (midline) may indicate a potential bottom, referencing a prior instance (Nov 4) where RSI at 50 preceded a bounce and “post election run.” Low-to-moderate actionability due to purely technical/analog framing and lack of defined catalyst/levels.
Supporting authors
Author: leki ⚔️ (handle @mkfilko). Author has published additional technical-analysis material and short technical updates, but the pinned post’s multi-ticker price targets stand alone without supporting rationale in the provided content.
Unlock full thesis monitoring
Consider this post as a directional watchlist rather than an actionable research report. If interested, perform independent due diligence: seek valuation, catalysts, timelines, and explicit risk management before trading these tickers.