mkfilko
@mkfilko
Past bets that played out
These are the clearest thesis calls with observable outcomes, linked back to the original videos.
Post is a bearish, technical-analysis driven take on $MRLN: persistent rejection at the 10EMA for ~2 months, a wedge pattern failing, and a recent PR (7/23) not moving the stock. Includes hyperbolic downside language (“going to 0”).
Single short post asserting 1–2 year upside price targets for several tickers (multi-market: US, Australia, UK, Korea). No supporting catalysts included in the text beyond the author claiming they are not random targets and that prior posts exist (not provided here). Actionability is low-to-moderate: directional and horizon are clear, but no thesis details, timing catalysts, valuation, or risk framing are provided in the post itself.
Single short post asserting 1–2 year upside price targets for several tickers (multi-market: US, Australia, UK, Korea). No supporting catalysts included in the text beyond the author claiming they are not random targets and that prior posts exist (not provided here). Actionability is low-to-moderate: directional and horizon are clear, but no thesis details, timing catalysts, valuation, or risk framing are provided in the post itself.
What this channel is watching now
Recent mentions show where this author is concentrating attention right now.
Latest videos and market context
Recent source posts from this author. Create an account to inspect the complete persisted research trail.
leki ⚔️ @mkfilko 1h The relative strength in $IQE compared to the markets is absolutely incredible. Seriously wow. Th...
Post highlights unusual relative strength in IQE versus broader markets; no explicit catalyst, valuation, or fundamental driver given. Actionable mainly as a momentum/relative-strength observation.
leki ⚔️ @mkfilko 14m Subs —— Remember super small positions if you w… Subscribe to unlock 3 157
Post appears paywalled/truncated (“Subscribe to unlock”) and contains no readable investment thesis, ticker mention, catalyst, or position details beyond a generic reminder about “super small positions.” Not actionable as source evidence.
leki ⚔️ @mkfilko 26m $MRLN Ok on a more serious note. Let me share some additional analysis on the stock. The stock h...
Post is a bearish, technical-analysis driven take on $MRLN: persistent rejection at the 10EMA for ~2 months, a wedge pattern failing, and a recent PR (7/23) not moving the stock. Includes hyperbolic downside language (“going to 0”).
Pinned leki ⚔️ @mkfilko Jun 25 In 1-2 years: You will be kicking yourself because: $BRUN would have ran to $120 $MRLN...
Single short post asserting 1–2 year upside price targets for several tickers (multi-market: US, Australia, UK, Korea). No supporting catalysts included in the text beyond the author claiming they are not random targets and that prior posts exist (not provided here). Actionability is low-to-moderate: directional and horizon are clear, but no thesis details, timing catalysts, valuation, or risk framing are provided in the post itself.
Proof-backed call history
These are recent thesis calls tied to original source content where available.
Post is a bearish, technical-analysis driven take on $MRLN: persistent rejection at the 10EMA for ~2 months, a wedge pattern failing, and a recent PR (7/23) not moving the stock. Includes hyperbolic downside language (“going to 0”).
Single short post asserting 1–2 year upside price targets for several tickers (multi-market: US, Australia, UK, Korea). No supporting catalysts included in the text beyond the author claiming they are not random targets and that prior posts exist (not provided here). Actionability is low-to-moderate: directional and horizon are clear, but no thesis details, timing catalysts, valuation, or risk framing are provided in the post itself.
Single short post asserting 1–2 year upside price targets for several tickers (multi-market: US, Australia, UK, Korea). No supporting catalysts included in the text beyond the author claiming they are not random targets and that prior posts exist (not provided here). Actionability is low-to-moderate: directional and horizon are clear, but no thesis details, timing catalysts, valuation, or risk framing are provided in the post itself.
Single short post asserting 1–2 year upside price targets for several tickers (multi-market: US, Australia, UK, Korea). No supporting catalysts included in the text beyond the author claiming they are not random targets and that prior posts exist (not provided here). Actionability is low-to-moderate: directional and horizon are clear, but no thesis details, timing catalysts, valuation, or risk framing are provided in the post itself.
Single short post asserting 1–2 year upside price targets for several tickers (multi-market: US, Australia, UK, Korea). No supporting catalysts included in the text beyond the author claiming they are not random targets and that prior posts exist (not provided here). Actionability is low-to-moderate: directional and horizon are clear, but no thesis details, timing catalysts, valuation, or risk framing are provided in the post itself.
Single-ticker technical sentiment post on TSLA: slight red day but author remains bullish due to holding ~$420, described as key technical confluence (POC, AVWAP from ATH, 20SMA). No fundamental catalyst or timeframe beyond near-term implied.
Post is a single-ticker technical observation: author notes a potential cup-and-handle pattern in $TSLA. No catalyst, levels, timeframe, or position sizing provided; actionable only as a near-term technical setup watch.
Very short, vague technical-analysis prompt on $TSLA (“Pull up 1H… do you see what I’m seeing?”) with no explicit pattern, level, catalyst, or direction stated. Actionability is low; at most it implies a near-term technical setup worth monitoring.
Post argues $TSLA is bullish based on technical indicators: inverted hammer candle close, proprietary trend tool “BX‑Trender” green tape, Williams %R above -50, and 9EMA holding as support. No fundamentals, catalyst, sizing, or risk levels provided.
Single short post disclosing prior losses in $TSLA and emphasizing patience/learning; no explicit forward-looking thesis, catalyst, valuation, product-cycle, or position-change detail.
Single short post disclosing prior losses in $TSLA and emphasizing patience/learning; no explicit forward-looking thesis, catalyst, valuation, product-cycle, or position-change detail.
Single-ticker technical-analysis comment on $TSLA suggesting RSI ~50 (midline) may indicate a potential bottom, referencing a prior instance (Nov 4) where RSI at 50 preceded a bounce and “post election run.” Low-to-moderate actionability due to purely technical/analog framing and lack of defined catalyst/levels.
About this channel
Channel bio, source link, and public-market context from YouTube.
@mkfilko
Most recognized assets
Unlock the full track record
Create an account to inspect the complete author history, trust-weighted rankings, and persisted research across authors, theses, and assets.
8 more thesis calls are available after sign-up.