leki ⚔️ @mkfilko Feb 10, 2025 $TSLA Total losses from $TSLA for transparency's sake. I'm not one to shy from making m...

Tesla, Inc.

Author discloses total losses in $TSLA and emphasizes learning from mistakes. Multiple short posts from the same author present bullish technical observations (key confluence near ~$420: POC, AVWAP from ATH, 20SMA; inverted hammer close; Williams %R and 9EMA holding) and note a possible cup‑and‑handle. These are near‑term technical signals without provided timeframes, sizing, or fundamental catalysts.

PAY is listed alongside the TSLA commentary in the author's summary thesis. The public posts themselves focus on TSLA technicals and the author's transparency about losses; no specific analysis, levels, or rationale for PAY are provided beyond being included in the thesis title.

Single-ticker technical sentiment post on TSLA: slight red day but author remains bullish due to holding ~$420, described as key technical confluence (POC, AVWAP from ATH, 20SMA). No fundamental catalyst or timeframe beyond near-term implied.

Post is a single-ticker technical observation: author notes a potential cup-and-handle pattern in $TSLA. No catalyst, levels, timeframe, or position sizing provided; actionable only as a near-term technical setup watch.

Very short, vague technical-analysis prompt on $TSLA (“Pull up 1H… do you see what I’m seeing?”) with no explicit pattern, level, catalyst, or direction stated. Actionability is low; at most it implies a near-term technical setup worth monitoring.

Post argues $TSLA is bullish based on technical indicators: inverted hammer candle close, proprietary trend tool “BX‑Trender” green tape, Williams %R above -50, and 9EMA holding as support. No fundamentals, catalyst, sizing, or risk levels provided.

Single short post disclosing prior losses in $TSLA and emphasizing patience/learning; no explicit forward-looking thesis, catalyst, valuation, product-cycle, or position-change detail.

Single-ticker technical-analysis comment on $TSLA suggesting RSI ~50 (midline) may indicate a potential bottom, referencing a prior instance (Nov 4) where RSI at 50 preceded a bounce and “post election run.” Low-to-moderate actionability due to purely technical/analog framing and lack of defined catalyst/levels.

Single-ticker technical price-target call on $TSLA: author says prior setup "played out" and is targeting ~$530 short term with expected initial resistance at that level. No fundamental catalyst, timing, or risk parameters provided.

Post discusses using the Williams %R technical indicator on TSLA’s daily chart, claiming it is fairly reliable for identifying tops/bottoms. No explicit signal level, entry/exit, or catalyst is provided, so actionability is low.