The Best AI Investor Is Betting Against NVIDIA
The Best AI Investor Is Betting Against NVIDIA. Reported short positions in NVIDIA and other infrastructure names, a large private investment in Anthropic, and recent Nvidia debt issuance have prompted a re-think of the AI infrastructure trade—shifting emphasis toward power, networking, memory and data-center buildout over a pure GPU-only narrative.
Linked assets
HQ — Linked to reporting about Leopold Aschenbrenner’s AI portfolio: reported puts/shorts on NVIDIA (and other infrastructure names), large private investment in Anthropic, and long exposure to memory, power, and data-center-related companies. Sources discuss NVIDIA’s $25 billion bond deal and an $80 billion buyback authorization mentioned in the coverage.
HQ — Linked to reporting on Leopold Aschenbrenner’s AI portfolio: reported large put/short exposure to NVIDIA and other infrastructure names, a private investment in Anthropic, and long exposure to memory, power, and data-center–related names.
Source reporting (Limitless FT podcast/newsletter) claims Leopold Aschenbrenner’s AI-focused fund has sizable short/put exposure—comments reference roughly $9 billion of puts across NVIDIA and other infrastructure names—and that the fund has deployed private capital into Anthropic (reported VC/private stake in March 2025). The coverage highlights NVIDIA’s recent capital activity (a reported $25 billion bond offering) and notes an $80 billion buyback authorization was mentioned in discussion. The hosts frame these moves as a strategic rotation: bearish or hedged positioning on crowded picks‑and‑shovels infrastructure (GPUs, some infrastructure providers) and long positions in memory, power, networking and data-center buildout companies that could benefit from the next infrastructure wave. These are reported claims from the podcast; amounts, timings, and positions should be independently verified before making investment decisions.
Source proof
Source proof: Strong source proof | 1 extracted claim | 1 directional asset | 1 supporting author | headline-like title review
Primary source material is a Limitless (Limitless FT) podcast/newsletter episode titled “The Best AI Investor Is Betting Against NVIDIA,” which lists timestamps and links (https://limitlessft.substack.com/, https://x.com/LimitlessFT). Key reported facts from the episode: Leopold Aschenbrenner’s fund reportedly holds sizable put/short exposure (comments reference about $9 billion of puts across NVIDIA and other names), a reported VC/private investment in Anthropic (noted as March 2025), NVIDIA’s recent $25 billion debt offering, and commentary that the AI infrastructure trade may be rotating into power, networking, memory, and data-center buildout. Additional related episodes and write-ups referenced Anthropic model releases and government export-control attention, and broader AI infrastructure and cloud themes.
Podcast/newsletter episode that discusses Leopold Aschenbrenner’s reported AI portfolio, including his alleged short on NVIDIA, a large private investment in Anthropic, NVIDIA’s bond offering, and the idea that the AI infrastructure trade is rotating from chips toward power, networking, memory, and data‑center buildout. Episode includes timestamps and links to the Limitless newsletter and social channels.
Reporting that Anthropic released then quickly withdrew frontier AI models (noted examples 'Fable 5' and 'Mythos 5') following a U.S. export-control / national-security notice. Coverage claims AWS allegedly restricted access due to unresolved API origin/destination verification and reported jailbreak concerns. The market takeaway suggested is rising regulatory/compliance burden for frontier AI distribution, which could advantage large, regulated platforms and defense/compliance vendors while creating monetization and headline risks for AI labs and cloud AI services.
Episode discussing SpaceX’s potential IPO, Starlink growth, and AI data-center plans, alongside notes about OpenAI data‑center deals and Anthropic’s model releases. The episode frames hardware and data-center scale as critical advantages and discusses implications for valuation and future capital flows into AI infrastructure.
Thematic episode on ‘AI loops’ and longer-running autonomous AI workflows, emphasizing rising compute and cost constraints and the ongoing importance of human judgment—contextual background for why infrastructure and runtime economics matter.
Coverage of Anthropic’s new model (Claude/Fable 5), showing stronger capabilities alongside tighter safety controls, demos across visual reasoning and enterprise use cases, and discussion of pricing and compute limits—relevant to debates about model distribution, compliance and cloud monetization.
Episode summarizing Apple’s WWDC AI/assistant updates (Apple Intelligence, on‑device + encrypted cloud processing) and potential rollout timing/regulatory friction—served as additional context for edge and memory/compute considerations in AI infrastructure.
Discussion of Microsoft Build and NVIDIA announcements, contrasting Microsoft’s AI adoption narrative with NVIDIA’s hardware momentum and noting compute constraints at large AI providers—context for platform versus chip dynamics.
Report on an alleged exploit abusing Meta’s AI-driven account recovery flow to perform account takeovers; highlights AI security risks, likely increases in security spending, and regulatory scrutiny—relevant to the broader security/compliance theme affecting AI deployments.
Supporting authors
Primary coverage and analysis comes from Limitless FT (podcast/newsletter hosts and contributors Josh and Ejaaz) and linked episodes discussing Anthropic, NVIDIA, Microsoft, Apple, and AI infrastructure themes. Source links include the Limitless newsletter and social handles (https://limitlessft.substack.com/, https://x.com/LimitlessFT, hosts’ handles referenced in episodes).
Unlock full thesis monitoring
Read the original Limitless episode and show notes for full context: https://limitlessft.substack.com/. Consider the claims as reported — verify positions, timing, and amounts independently before acting.