activemixedx

Pinned Con @__Con_ Jun 26 ALL IN TRADE (1k-100k challenge, up to 1.4k): I sold my $BRUN. Now, I'm buying into a stock...

Author reports selling $BRUN and rotating into another stock after short-term gains. Argues BRUN/OPTX look bottomed and presents a short-term rebound setup. The post is tactical and lacks detailed catalysts, financials, or risk controls.

Confidence
35 / 100
Assets
2
Authors
1
Outcome
open

Linked assets

BRUN, OPTX — both mentioned as part of a short-term bottom/rebound setup (BRUN explicitly sold by the author; BRUN/OPTX described as "bottomed").

BRUNbuyopen

Mentioned as the stock the author sold; presented as part of a short-term rebound/bottoming setup alongside OPTX.

Confidence: 38 / 100Start: $37.44Latest: $37.44Return: 0.00%

‘Back in $BRUN… BRUN/OPTX looks bottomed here.’ The author reports selling $BRUN and characterizes BRUN/OPTX as bottomed, implying a tactical long/rebound view. No financials, catalysts, or risk-management details were provided.

OPTXbeneficiaryopen

Referenced alongside BRUN as part of a paired bottoming observation (BRUN/OPTX).

Confidence: 32 / 100Start: $12.47Latest: $12.47Return: 0.00%

Mentioned as paired bottoming context: ‘BRUN/OPTX looks bottomed.’ The post implies OPTX is part of the same short-term rebound setup, but provides no independent evidence or concrete catalyst.

Source proof

Source proof: Strong source proof | 8 extracted claims | 2 directional assets | 1 supporting author | headline-like title review

Primary source: a pinned social post titled "ALL IN TRADE (1k-100k challenge, up to 1.4k): I sold my $BRUN. Now, I'm buying into a stock..." The speaker states they sold $BRUN, claims prior gains in BRUN and OPTX, and describes BRUN/OPTX as looking bottomed, implying a tactical long setup. Additional related posts by the same author present other ticker views (MU, SPCX, AAOI, NVDA, NBIS, NIO, GME, PLTR) but provide few supporting data or concrete catalysts.

Pinned Con @__Con_ Jun 26 ALL IN TRADE (1k-100k challenge, up to 1.4k): I sold my $BRUN. Now, I'm buying into a stock...
__con_

Speaker claims to have sold $BRUN and is rotating into $VELO (advanced-materials/metal 3D printing) after prior short-term gains in $BRUN and $OPTX. Also states BRUN/OPTX “looks bottomed,” implying a tactical long setup. Actionability is limited by lack of concrete catalyst/financials and potential ticker ambiguity (especially $VELO).

View source
Pinned Con @__Con_ 2h We went from "everything is going to the moon!" To "bear markets starting, I should sell." But ...
__con_

Speaker argues sentiment has flipped from bullish to bearish and claims “now is the time to buy.” Makes three ticker calls: $MU will beat earnings (bullish catalyst), $SPCX will move higher (bullish), and $AAOI will not reach $80 (bearish/anti-momentum). No supporting data provided beyond assertion.

View source
Pinned Con @__Con_ 3h Some stock fields will perform better than others. We got 5 areas of interest. Here's how I'm p...
__con_

Post claims a sector rotation favoring “AI enablers” is underway and cites $NVDA and $NBIS as examples that have “been going up like crazy,” expecting them to have the “biggest run.” No concrete catalysts, valuation, timing, risk controls, or the other “5 areas” are included in the provided text (appears truncated).

View source
Con @__Con_ Nov 5, 2025 Replying to @WatcherGuru Yeah... "We're going to get so tired of winning..."
__con_

A short, sarcastic political-style remark (“We’re going to get so tired of winning…”) with no explicit market, sector, macro, or company/ticker reference. No investable implication is stated.

View source
Con @__Con_ Sep 16, 2025 I might have found a 10x stock: $NIO Here's my review and why I'm so bullish: Fundamentals: ...
__con_

Post claims $NIO could be a “10x stock” and cites NIO’s battery swap technology (sub-5-minute battery exchanges) as a key fundamental bullish driver versus conventional charging. No valuation, timing catalyst, financial metrics, or risk discussion included in the visible excerpt.

View source
Con @__Con_ Oct 28, 2025 Replying to @WatcherGuru Ig we gotta add in pltr now... the bubble just keeps growing
__con_

Single short social reply implying $PLTR is part of a growing market “bubble.” No catalyst, timing, or positioning details provided.

View source
Con @__Con_ Aug 29, 2024 Replying to @sama Do you guys think China's ai models will develop faster now because of thi...
__con_

A single-question social reply asking whether China’s AI models will develop faster due to an unspecified regulation. No tickers, no concrete catalyst details, no stated view or position, and no actionable trade implication.

View source
Con @__Con_ Nov 11, 2024 $gme has to be one of the most bullish charts I have seen in a while...
__con_

Single short post expressing a bullish technical view on $GME (“one of the most bullish charts”). No catalyst, timeframe, levels, or risk management provided; actionable only as a general near-term technical-long sentiment.

View source

Supporting authors

Single author (pinned account @__Con_). Multiple related posts show the author's broader market views and ticker-level opinions, but the pinned post is the principal source for this thesis.

Unlock full thesis monitoring

Consider this a short-term/tactical observation rather than a fundamental investment thesis. If acting on it, verify ticker identities, seek independent catalysts and financials, and apply position-sizing and risk controls before trading.