I'm Leveraged to the Tits in a Stock Market Bubble

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is a leveraged exchange-traded fund seeking three times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.

I'm Leveraged to the Tits in a Stock Market Bubble 🚀 Copy My Portfolios Automatically → https://marketplace.joinautopilot.com/landing/1218/542069 ( Earn $20 in the stock and a 30% discount on Autopilot when you join using Public. Most... Hey guys, it's In The Money. You know, one of the greatest pieces of advice touted by the investing community comes from the crusty mouth of one of the most influential investors of all time, the Oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffett. He said something that should stick in every investor's mind, like that one time you didn't take profits. It's be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful. But here's the deal. He got it wrong. You see, last night I was watching The Big Short for the 14th time, and that's been conservative. And as nice as it is to see Margot Robbie in a bubble bath explain something she herself clearly does not understand, what really stood out to me is what Michael Burry said in the film. He said, Watch, we'll pay. I may have been early, but I'm not wrong. This was quickly retorted by some angry man in a suit saying, It's the same thing. It's the same thing, Mike. Point being, they aren't the same thing. You can be early and be right, hence the whole movie. But the whole time you're early, you could have been holding those mortgage bonds for some juicy returns until the adjustable rates kicked in in 07, and then shorted the housing market. Right when everyone defaulted on their home loans, the mortgage bonds went belly up, therefore the CDOs, synthetic CDOs, and the world economy exploded. I say all of this to say one thing. If you're in a bubble, if people are being greedy, you ride that fucking greed. And when they panic, when things suddenly go south, you dump your bags on those losers and you buy the dip. This is a very roundabout justification for this monstrosity, which I assume is behind me now. My Roth IRA. What's your exposure, $3 billion? Please don't tell me it's more than $4 billion. I can't answer that. While everyone is screaming AI bubble, I kind of like bubbles. Margot Robbie and I have more in common than you might think. So 20 options, leap options in particular, across a variety of underlyings and strikes, over half of my portfolio. Some were grossly out of the money, but I sold those for a profit and reined it in a little. Still plenty are out of the money because, God bless him and his little home in Omaha, I ride the bubble like the Wizard of Oz witch until it pops. By the way, this bubble is bubble-ish. Before the dot-com bubble, or at least leading up to it bursting, Amazon was trading at $9 in 1998 and had achieved a 2,600% return since its IPO the prior year with an expected return of 300%, so that's 4,300%, over the next 18 months projected by a daring analyst named Henry Blodgett. Now I hate analysts. There's a reason the word anal is in the word analyst. It's because they have their heads so far up their asses they can't smell a trend from a turd. Amazon was actively losing money at the time with a $17 billion market cap. So why the hell am I doing this but not YOLOing my full portfolio into TQQQ on autopilot? Well, firstly, believe it or not, I have a sense of fiduciary responsibility to others. What can I say? I'm a good guy. Secondly, I know how to manage losing leap options quite well, especially with half of my portfolio being in really boring stocks and ETFs. If my leaps eat shit, I can recycle what's left and use some of the equity to refresh my leaps and do this a couple rounds over. They expire over two years from now, so I can do this for multiple cycles. I can feed the engine for years, but the risk is, of course, I eventually run out of coal and the gains train does eventually roll to a stop. This quote-unquote strategy is appropriate for only a very few amount of people. I do not recommend it as I'm not using it to secure retirement like most people would do with a Roth. If I wanted that, I would throw it into a managed account already and be happy to end with $2 to $4 million by the time I'm 59. Quite the contrary, I am actually hedging against salt death, first of all, because there's no guarantee I'll make it to 59, but secondly, I'm going for a fucking home run so hard it would take down salt all over again. If I ended with $2 to $4 million of tax-free returns, great. If I end with $50 million, there's something I have really specific in mind, and you'll have to bear with me. I know you guys are sick of hearing it and just want to know what the stock to buy, but my brain got destroyed by encephalitis. Very casual. I'm much better, and from your perspective, I might seem actually perfectly capable. I would actually consider myself disabled. I could list the ways in which I feel disabled, and it might make sense to you because I just put half my Roth into call options, but this is not a sob story. My hope, my goal, my ride of this too-early part of this frothy, overvalued, bubble-ish market is to hit 59 with an unfathomable amount of tax-free returns in combination with great advancement in medical technology that I might be able to blow it all on niche, advanced treatment to patch my brain up, I don't know, 50%, so I can live the

The source is an educational/promotional post about how to trade futures on Robinhood, emphasizing that futures are leveraged (“double-edged sword”), can be preferable to frequent short-term options trading, and can be used for hedging. No specific market catalyst, earnings, or macro event is referenced; it’s primarily instructional content that could marginally point to increased retail interest/engagement in Robinhood’s futures offering.

Macro reassurance post: warns recession risk is elevated (tariffs/retaliation → higher inflation → rates higher for longer/possible hikes → higher unemployment → recession risk). Main message is behavioral (don’t panic sell; you’ll live through multiple drawdowns), not a specific trade call.

Post is mostly commentary: VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) is up ~9% YoY and is framed as a “safe” place investors flee to after getting burned in short-dated options/leveraged trading (0DTE, weeklies, futures). No concrete catalyst, data point, or timing signal is provided.

The source is a clickbait-style commentary arguing inflation is rising due to tariffs (costs passed through to consumers with a lag), not primarily due to monetary policy. Implication: higher/stickier inflation increases the risk of higher-for-longer rates, multiple compression for equities, and pressure on rate-sensitive growth stocks.

Promotional/entertainment-style post framing the market as a bubble and discussing being heavily leveraged, with references to Buffett-style sentiment and “The Big Short.” The provided excerpt contains no concrete positions, catalysts, or specific tickers/sectors to evaluate.

A promotional, rant-style post that frames Duolingo as overhyped/overvalued (“billion-dollar delusion”) and explicitly suggests the author wants to short the stock, but provides no concrete new data, catalyst, or verifiable claims beyond sentiment.

The entry reads like a comedic/fictional skit (promotional link + voicemail-style jokes) implying Michael Burry is buying NVDA/PLTR puts and is closing Scion Asset Management. It does not present verifiable, timestamped, primary-source evidence (e.g., SEC filings, official statement) and therefore is not reliable as actionable market news.

Promotional post for an “Autopilot” copy-trading link plus a rant arguing that recent market weakness (e.g., ~4% dip in QQQ) is being overinterpreted as a “bubble popping.” No concrete catalysts, earnings/news, positioning data, or specific trade setups are provided beyond the sentiment that pullbacks are normal and social-media panic is overblown.