“Trump 2.0 will be completely different”: who benefits from his victory and what this has to do with Bitcoin / Grigory Beglaryan
A discussion of the typical 'Trump trade' sector split — energy and defense versus renewables — and how a potential Trump victory could shift regulatory priorities, fiscal policy and market positioning. The piece also touches on Bitcoin's role in that landscape.
Linked tickers
Trade framework: pro-energy and defense bias under deregulation and higher fiscal spending vs. headwinds for renewables sensitive to rates and policy. Example tickers: XOM (integrated oil & gas), LMT (defense systems), NEE (utilities/renewables).
Exxon Mobil Corporation engages in the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas in the United States, Canada, and internationally.
Oil & gas as a potential beneficiary of deregulation and a shift in focus away from subsidized renewables.
The company operates through four segments: Aeronautics; Missiles and Fire Control (MFC); Rotary and Mission Systems (RMS); and Space.
Defense as a hedge against geopolitical uncertainty.
NextEra Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, generates, stores, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power to retail and wholesale customers in North America.
Renewables/utilities are sensitive to interest rates and political expectations around subsidies and regulation.
Source proof
Based on an interview-style segment titled “Trump 2.0 will be completely different” by Grigory Beglaryan. The original excerpt is fragmentary; conclusions here rely on conventional market expectations around a Trump victory rather than direct, actionable claims from the source.
Introductory fragment to the 'Money Doesn't Sleep' episode with Vasily Oleynik covering macro forecasts for 2024: expectations for the Russian economy, the ruble and the Russian equity market, plus general thoughts on the financial system and where to store wealth. The provided text contains no specific asset theses, forecasts or mentions of individual tickers.
Announcement/description of an interview about geopolitics: potential escalation around Taiwan and implications for the global economy, China–Russia dependence, Russia’s role in the US–China–Russia triangle, secondary sanctions, and discussion of a potential 'BRICS unified currency.' No policy decisions, figures or dates are present—this serves as background for assessing geopolitical premia in risky assets.
Introductory text to a 'Money Doesn't Sleep' episode with economist Aleksandr Kubyshkin. Topics include the resilience of the US economy, rising US federal debt and the potential of the US market; possible strains in the Eurozone; and sanctions. The fragment contains no concrete Fed/ECB decisions, figures or company tickers, so its direct trading applicability is limited.
Russian-language announcement/description of an interview with economist Aleksandr Auzan about Russia’s future and 'investments' in the broader sense (education, human capital, attitude to mistakes and the future). No specific companies, sector triggers, regulatory decisions or financial figures are provided; the material is philosophical/macro and not directly translated into trading signals.
Headline and excerpt indicate an interview/discussion on the 'Trump 2.0' scenario: which sectors/assets could win from his victory and how Bitcoin fits in. The body text was not provided (truncated), so conclusions here are inferred from typical market expectations around a 'Trump trade' and the headline's mention of BTC, without direct quotes or numeric claims from the speaker.
Announcement of an interview about the Russian housing market: when prices might decline, risks of a 'mortgage crisis' and possible developer bankruptcies. The text contains no concrete figures, regulatory rulings or dates, making it a thematic media signal about sector risk rather than an immediate market trigger.
Promo for a 'Money Doesn't Sleep' episode with Dmitry Cheremushkin discussing what investors should prepare for in 2025 after a difficult 2024, including three strategies for 2025 and 'secrets of the optimist's portfolio.' The provided text lacks concrete asset- or sector-level theses and specific tickers.
Announcement of an episode discussing how geopolitics can inflict sudden shocks on markets and ways to protect capital. The fragment contains no company names, transactions or numerical data—it's a general macro thesis on rising tail risks and the need for hedges and diversification.
Supporting authors
Primary author: Grigory Beglaryan. Related contextual material includes interviews and macro discussions from contributors such as Vasily Oleynik, Nikolay Vavilov, Aleksandr Kubyshkin, Aleksandr Auzan, Sergey Smirnov, Dmitry Cheremushkin, and Evgeny Kogan.
Unlock full play monitoring
Consider a mixed strategy: overweight traditional energy and defense as policy- and geopolitically-driven hedges, while keeping selective exposure to renewables depending on rates outlook and subsidy/regulatory developments. Review position sizing and hedges against geopolitical shocks.