Y Combinator

...C batches I agree on both those points. We have PE this guy with a MIT PhD in nuclear the MIT nuclear PhD to the the um the that have like API money to actually uh long, but you know, we do four batches a votes, launch two up votes, launch sell to XAI for $60 billion. hypothesis very very quickly and then hypothesis or not and if not you change normally for an LLM it's mostly about PLG you talk to customers not all of advice from YC that you should pivot. Uh specifically even if you have reve

...om have um about the AI native company. I fully understand and I think everyone understood because of your presentation. However, how can you actually practically start and building the structure to build that AI native company? Like do you go on claude code and tell him exactly everything that you told us? Because we understand the idea, the concept, but in terms of how do you actually do it? Um, so thank you. >> Thanks. [snorts] Um, I'd pick a single loop basically. So I' presumably your co

Content is a YC Startup School talk about building durable startups in the AI era. The actionable market-relevant bits are mostly high-level: (1) intelligence/AI inference is getting much cheaper, (2) moats shift away from “model choice” toward distribution, product loops, data/workflows, and founder execution, and (3) US export restrictions on frontier AI matter. No explicit company mentions or investable calls, so tickers are inferred by theme (AI compute stack, hyperscalers, and export-contro

Content is a YC Startup School talk about building durable startups in the AI era. The actionable market-relevant bits are mostly high-level: (1) intelligence/AI inference is getting much cheaper, (2) moats shift away from “model choice” toward distribution, product loops, data/workflows, and founder execution, and (3) US export restrictions on frontier AI matter. No explicit company mentions or investable calls, so tickers are inferred by theme (AI compute stack, hyperscalers, and export-contro

Content is a YC Startup School talk about building durable startups in the AI era. The actionable market-relevant bits are mostly high-level: (1) intelligence/AI inference is getting much cheaper, (2) moats shift away from “model choice” toward distribution, product loops, data/workflows, and founder execution, and (3) US export restrictions on frontier AI matter. No explicit company mentions or investable calls, so tickers are inferred by theme (AI compute stack, hyperscalers, and export-contro

Content is a YC Startup School talk about building durable startups in the AI era. The actionable market-relevant bits are mostly high-level: (1) intelligence/AI inference is getting much cheaper, (2) moats shift away from “model choice” toward distribution, product loops, data/workflows, and founder execution, and (3) US export restrictions on frontier AI matter. No explicit company mentions or investable calls, so tickers are inferred by theme (AI compute stack, hyperscalers, and export-contro

Content is a YC Startup School talk about building durable startups in the AI era. The actionable market-relevant bits are mostly high-level: (1) intelligence/AI inference is getting much cheaper, (2) moats shift away from “model choice” toward distribution, product loops, data/workflows, and founder execution, and (3) US export restrictions on frontier AI matter. No explicit company mentions or investable calls, so tickers are inferred by theme (AI compute stack, hyperscalers, and export-contro

..., "Okay, I the legal team, you know, they will never ever uh want to have this discussion with me." And so we knew we cannot release it. It's just an example. Um and so OpenAI could do could take some risks with with GPT-1, 2, 3, you know, until ChatGPT. That that no one else could could do. So they have the ability to they have enough money and resources to scale this training. >> [snorts] >> And but the ability to take risk at because yes, they they had this combination they they made it wh

Talk-level, largely qualitative discussion about AI startups vs Big Tech, with mentions of LLM limits, “world models,” robotics, and continued need for large-scale GPU compute. Actionability is low because there are no concrete catalysts, numbers, or near-term company-specific claims; the most tradable takeaway is a continued AI compute/infra demand narrative (GPU/accelerators, foundry, advanced packaging).

Talk-level, largely qualitative discussion about AI startups vs Big Tech, with mentions of LLM limits, “world models,” robotics, and continued need for large-scale GPU compute. Actionability is low because there are no concrete catalysts, numbers, or near-term company-specific claims; the most tradable takeaway is a continued AI compute/infra demand narrative (GPU/accelerators, foundry, advanced packaging).

Talk-level, largely qualitative discussion about AI startups vs Big Tech, with mentions of LLM limits, “world models,” robotics, and continued need for large-scale GPU compute. Actionability is low because there are no concrete catalysts, numbers, or near-term company-specific claims; the most tradable takeaway is a continued AI compute/infra demand narrative (GPU/accelerators, foundry, advanced packaging).

Talk-level, largely qualitative discussion about AI startups vs Big Tech, with mentions of LLM limits, “world models,” robotics, and continued need for large-scale GPU compute. Actionability is low because there are no concrete catalysts, numbers, or near-term company-specific claims; the most tradable takeaway is a continued AI compute/infra demand narrative (GPU/accelerators, foundry, advanced packaging).